Judge Rinder, Deborah V Neil
Season 3, Episode 8
HDWatch all available episodes of Judge Rinder Season 3
Judge Rinder presides over a case involving money owed for a sofa after the end of a marriage and another and another concerning an infected arm after a tattoo in Blackpool.
RAF V ClarissaJudge Rinder presides over a case involving money lending that got out of hand and another concerning a missing drum kit.
Jermaine V DarrenJudge Rinder presides over a case involving damage to a male stripper's outfit and another concerning a faulty car.
Jenny V DeanJudge Rinder presides over a case involving Jenny who is in court, looking for compensation from Dean on a faulty car he sold to her.
Webby V CheJudge Rinder presides over a case involving Webby who is in court, claiming Che stole up to 4000 pounds from him on a building job.
Fred V DominicJudge Rinder presides over a case involving a loan dispute between friends.
Patricia V NelliePatricia is in court to claim back 5000 pounds for loans she made to her sister to help pay for a new car and a deposit on a property.
Deborah V NeilDeborah is in court to claim 825 pounds to correct repairs made to her garden wall by her neighbour.
June V AlanJudge Rinder presides over two cases involving loans that the defendants believed were gifts.
Romeo V TarekJudge Rinder presides over a case involving a brother who loaned money to another brother who maintains that, since it's a family matter, it shouldn't have to be repaid.
Natalie V JaneJudge Rinder presides over a case concerning damages for loss of business and defamation.
Atul V TerryAtul is claiming back £300 he paid for a role in a film which has not been made. Defendant Terry says the film is still in pre-production and will eventually be made. Austin is in court to claim £200 for the replacement of his iPod.
Tarjih V NathanielJudge Rinder presides over a case concerning money owed to models used on a video shoot.
Ron V CristinaMan claims his ex-partner defaulted on a loan he signed as guarantor and two brothers argue over the sale of a mobile phone.
Evett V SophiaMother and daughter argue over payments for a set of pots and a man wants money back for a faulty moped but the seller says it was fine when she sold it to him.
Sue V ElleJudge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner.
Sharon V MattJudge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner.
Ian V SteveJudge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner.
Terry V TonyJudge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner.
Angelica V AshleighJudge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner.
Brun V TonyJudge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner.
Nes & Gavin V St. JohnJudge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner.
Julia V FrancisJudge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner.
Maria V PeteJudge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner.
Judy V MatthewJudge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner.
Jack V NikoJudge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner.
Linda V JessJudge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner.
Rebecca V MatthewJudge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner.
Julian V MatthewJudge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner.
Ashley V VickyJudge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner.
Show more- About this episode
- In a format similar to popular American show `Judge Judy', small claims cases are adjudicated in a studio courtroom presided over by criminal law barrister Rob Rinder. Each programme sees three different cases brought before the judge, who questions claimants and defendants, speaks to witnesses, assess the evidence and makes judgements. He also reserves the right to throw the case, and the people, out of his court! Called in 2001, Rinder at his legal practice focuses on international fraud, money laundering, and other forms of financial crime, a long gavel throw away from the cases he judges on TV.
- CrewMatt Woodward (Director)
- GenreFeatures
- Seasons1
- StudioCrime+Inv
You may also like
Judge Rinder's Interrogation Secrets
S1-2 streaming